The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to partially bar Glo lines from calling MTN lines, citing unpaid interconnectivity charges, has ignited a fierce debate within the country.
The move has raised questions about whether the NCC should prioritize the interests of a South African company like MTN, which repatriates profits, or a Nigerian company like Globacom, contributing to the growth of the Naira by keeping revenue and profits within the country.
Renowned commentator and former presidential aide, Reno Omokri, has been vocal about his concerns regarding the NCC’s decision. Omokri questions the tolerance of President Bola Tinubu in the face of such actions and challenges whether South African President Cyril Ramaphosa would allow a similar move against a South African company in favor of a foreign firm.
Advocating for a “Nigerian-first” approach to economic, diplomatic, and civic policies, Omokri emphasizes the potential negative impact on the Naira and national reputation if the NCC’s actions continue. He urges those around President Tinubu to intervene, highlighting that Glo is a Nigerian firm making positive contributions to the economy and national pride.
Drawing parallels to President Tinubu’s previous interventions, particularly in the Wike-Fubara feud, Omokri underscores the importance of protecting, projecting, and promoting Glo. He calls on the current administration to continue the positive tradition of intervening to support Nigerian conglomerates, citing past examples like the Dangote Group and Oando.
As stakeholders eagerly await a response from President Tinubu and the NCC, the controversy surrounding the partial blocking of Glo-MTN calls underscores the broader debate over economic protectionism and the role of regulatory bodies in safeguarding national interests. The outcome of this debate could have far-reaching implications for the Nigerian telecommunications industry and the broader economic landscape.
